We must consider if Trident can be justified

31 07 2010

George Osborne has told the Ministry of Defence that it will be responsible for the cost of replacing Trident – so the capital costs cannot be paid outside the defence budget – as has been the case in the past – leaving just the running costs within the defence spend.

During the election we said that you cannot make a decision about Trident outside the Strategic Defence Review, and our position was therefore, that Trident should be considered along with all other military options.    Whilst we did not manage to get that built into the coalition agreement, we did get agreement to a value for money review.

If the Ministry of Defence is to be made to pay for the full replacement of Trident within its budgets, it strengthens the case for the like-for-like replacement of Trident to be part of the Strategic Defence Review.   It simply does not make sense to take on such a huge financial commitment as Trident without considering other military priorities.





Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament

26 03 2010

I have been asked by CND, if elected, whether I would vote for or against the replacement of Trident and if I back UK support for a Nuclear Weapons Convention banning all nuclear weapons internationally.

Our party policy is that there should be no like-for-like replacement of Trident and that Britain should adopt a cheaper, more minimal system, should it prove necessary to maintain a nuclear deterrent as a result of the Strategic Defence Review.

We unequivocally support the goal of a world without nuclear weapons and we will continue to support steps towards such multilateral disarmament.

If you want to ask me any further questions on this issue, please use the link on the blog to email me.








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.